Diner Complains About Babys Butthole and Social Media Basically Explodes

Stephen Hawking Confesses To A Fear Of Alien Invasion

Sponsored by AMA News 

=>

Everyone is entitled to their irrational fears; whether you’re afraid of clowns, terrified of even the most innocuous of spiders or suffer from vertigo, we all have that one thing that scares us senseless. And when it comes to this breed of terror, it doesn’t matter how rational or educated you are. Certainly, I have ophidiophobia, a fear of snakes.

Whilst the cold-blooded creatures posed quite a threat to our ancestors back in the day, I know that we have little reason to fear them now, unless we willingly step onto Australian soil or take a stroll through the Amazon rainforest. But there’s just something about their scaliness, vertical pupils… oh, and the fact that they can be incredibly venomous, that puts me on edge. I was made to feel a little better about my ophidiophobia, however, when I heard that even Stephen Hawking, the astrophysicist extraordinaire had his own irrational fear: aliens. Stephen Hawking’s short online documentary, Stephen Hawking’s Favourite Places, shows the famed English theoretical physicist take viewers on his CGI spacecraft, The SS Hawking, to five notable locations across the galaxy. In the film, Hawking reveals his beliefs on the prospect of there being other life forms in our Solar System. Upon arriving at a planet 16 light years away, Gliese 832c, Hawking discloses that he does believe in alien life. He muses: “As I grow older I am more convinced than ever that we are not alone. After a lifetime of wondering, I am helping to lead a new global effort to find out. The Breakthrough Listen project will scan the nearest million stars for signs of life, but I know just the place to start looking.” Despite believing that such life exists, Hawking doesn’t necessarily recommend interacting with it, and warns about the dangers of doing so. He frankly states: “one day we might receive a signal from a planet like Gliese 832c, but we should be wary of answering back. This may sound counterintuitive coming from a man who has spent the majority of his 75 years dedicated to the study of cosmology, the branch of astronomy that involves the origin and evolution of the universe. However, Hawking may have good reason for wanting to avoid alternate life forms. Harking back to history, he implies that initiating contact with advanced civilisations could be reminiscent of what happened when Christopher Columbus first encountered the Native Americans, where things “didn’t turn out so well.” So maybe Hawking is warning that we might become victims of mass colonisation and face enslavement. Karma can be a b****, right? Hawking has made it clear that if alien life exists, it’s probably a lot more advanced than us. When he set about launching his Breakthrough Listen Project in 2015, he was vocal in his belief that anyone who could pick up our messages were likely to be billions of years ahead in terms of technological advancement. Rather worryingly, he commented: “if so they will be vastly more powerful and may not see us as any more valuable than we see bacteria.” The 26-minute documentary aired on CuriosityStream, and begins with Hawking talking us through the Big Bang before arriving back to Santa Barbara, California where he elaborates on his early career. Well, I think Stephen might have just addedanother irrational fear to my collection. Guess I’m going to have to think twice next time I tune into one of Hollywood’s alien invasion flicks.

More From this publisher : HERE

=>
***********************************************
Read More Here: Stephen Hawking Confesses To A Fear Of Alien Invasion
************************************
=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  BuletViralTraffic 

=>>

Stephen Hawking Confesses To A Fear Of Alien Invasion was originally posted by Viral News 1

U.S. Economic Growth Rebounds, But Breaking Out Is Hard to Do

No One Can Figure Out How This Enormous Tortoise Was Kidnapped From a Zoo

Sponsored by  our friends from Met001.biz 

=>

n July 17, the New York Post reported that a 100-year-old, almost 100-pound African stimulated tortoise called Millennium was abducted from the Alley Pond Environmental Center in Queens, New York.

This case of the taken tortoise is more than a relatively random criminal offense; it's a neighborhood catastrophe. Centuries was frequently a star individual of birthday celebrations and school occasions around the location kids liked him, and now he's gone.

Tortoise shell? More like tortoise hell.

The NYC mayor's workplace tweeted this plea to assist authorities bring Millennium house.

Help us discover Millennium! https://t.co/p2D0JvWaka

NYC Mayor'' s Office (@NYCMayorsOffice) July 18, 2017

The personnel at the ecological center initially saw the tortoise was missing on Monday, July 17 around 4:15 in the afternoon.

Does this mean that tortoise burglars in some way snuck the massive reptile from the zoo in the middle of the day?

Not precisely.

Authorities think he was either taken previously that day or over the weekend.

through: Getty Images

Millennium's pen seemed required open. Why would anybody go through the huge effort to take this tortoise?

(To be clear, the tortoise in the above photo isn't really Millennium.We could not snap a picture; he wasabducted.)

This tortoise isn't really Millennium either, however he is distressed to discover his buddy is missing out on.

through: Getty Images

According to the New York Post , Millennium might be worth a quite cent upwards of $2,500 on the black market.

Needless to state, kids who enjoyed Millennium are ravaged by the kidnapping.

I am unfortunate and mad, 8-year-old Ethan Lai informed the New York Post . Somebody took him. Thats incorrect. Bring him back. He is my good friend!

Right you are, Ethan. You are.

If you're reading this, tortoise swipers, this fellow ancient monster is gazing deep into your souls, and he desires you to return Millennium.

through: Getty Images

Authorities have actually discovered footprints leading from a hole in his fence to Northern Boulevard. There are no tortoise prints, however, which recommends that he was brought off. Tortoises are infamously slow-moving, so he most likely wasn't counted on to run.

The examination is continuous, and authorities are examining security video from around the enclosure to see if they can discover any leads.

But I have a suspect in mind

Remember that episode of Hey Arnold! where Arnold and his Grandma spring Lockjaw the ancient tortoise from his unfortunate fish tank life?

by means of: Giphy

Nuff stated.

More From this publisher: HERE

=>
***********************************************
See Full Article Here: No One Can Figure Out How This Enormous Tortoise Was Kidnapped From a Zoo
************************************
=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  BuletViralTraffic 

=>>

No One Can Figure Out How This Enormous Tortoise Was Kidnapped From a Zoo was originally posted by Viral News 1

Christopher Nolan’s ‘Dunkirk’ is our cry of the week (and no, it’s not because of Harry Styles)

How a Canadian Timber Company Is Using U.S. Racketeering Law to Go After Greenpeace

Sponsored by  FreePLRArticles.biz 

=>

For several years, Greenpeace has been mounting a multimedia campaign against Canada's Resolute Forest Products, one of the largest timber-and-paper companies in the world. Called “Resolute: Forest Destroyer,” the campaign accuses the company of endangering the Boreal Forest, a vast evergreen swath that covers a third of northern Canada.

In response, Resolute has taken the extreme step of suing Greenpeace in the U.S. for violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The suit, filed last year and pending in federal court in San Francisco, home to Greenpeace’s forest campaigners, seeks to prove that the environmental group is akin to a mob syndicate. The company says it has suffered a $100 million hit to its reputation. Given that damages can be tripled under RICO, a decision in Resolute’s favor would endanger Greenpeace’s very existence. The suit has strong support in communities tied to the forestry industry. “This is the first time a company has stood up to an outside group and said we won’t take this anymore,” says David Canfield, the mayor of Kenora, a town in northwestern Ontario.

Resolute isn’t the first corporation to try this strategy. Chevron recently used the racketeering act against environmental activists who had sued it over oil pollution in Ecuador. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court left in place a lower-court ruling that protected the company from having to pay damages in the U.S. related to the Ecuadorian mess. Chevron proved that its activist foes had transformed their suit against the company into an extortion plot featuring bribery, fabrication of evidence, and the ghostwriting of judicial opinions.

By comparison, Greenpeace’s alleged offenses seem less dire, but that isn’t to say its assertions have been airtight. For one thing, Resolute isn’t “destroying” the Boreal. According to the government agency Natural Resources Canada, less than 0.5 percent of the country’s forest acreage is harvested annually (and only a minority of that is taken by Resolute). With the exception of logging roads, 100 percent of forest that’s harvested is regenerated naturally or by seeding or planting, the agency says. “‘Destroying’ means something: It's going away and not coming back,” Resolute’s lawyer, Michael Bowe, says. The Boreal, he adds, isn’t disappearing in that fashion. 

“The idea that we’re the ones doing damage is patently false and malicious,” says Seth Kursman, Resolute’s spokesman. The company accuses Greenpeace of other distortions—misrepresenting trees felled by natural causes as having been illegally cut down; predicting that Resolute activities will lead to a caribou “death spiral,” when the animals at risk are in western Canada, far from Resolute’s operations in the east; and blaming the company for hastening climate change when, Resolute claims, the old-growth forest that loggers take down absorbs dramatically less carbon dioxide than young forest growth that results from seeding, planting, or natural regeneration. 

In keeping with RICO, the suit holds that Greenpeace has run something like a protection racket by threatening the company’s corporate customers with boycotts if they don’t cut ties with Resolute over these issues. Resolute says it has lost $100 million in revenue because of such threats—the basis of its damages claim. The company also accuses Greenpeace of fraudulently inducing “many millions of dollars” in donations from “regular working-class people who have been duped” into believing their money prevents forest loss, climate change, and caribou suffering. When I question whether Resolute has standing to vindicate the rights of Greenpeace contributors, Bowe responds that donors were harmed by the racketeering “enterprise” and are therefore properly included as victims. While he acknowledges that his evidence may not have the earmarks of traditional organized crime,  he hastens to add, “I don’t think you have to have a Chevron case to have a RICO case.”

Greenpeace General Counsel Tom Wetterer says that the group stands behind its past statements and actions. But in its legal papers, the organization claims it can win the case without having been error-free in its claims about Resolute. The defense argument begins with the idea that Resolute has dressed up a garden-variety defamation suit as a racketeering case. When viewed properly under U.S. defamation law, the defense says, Greenpeace’s attacks on the company—including boycott threats—constitute protected free speech. And when statements relate to issues of public concern, the First Amendment protects accusatory language employed “in a loose figurative sense.” That last point comes from the holding of a 1974 Supreme Court decision on labor organizing, which also said “rhetorical hyperbole” and “vigorous epithet” are protected. Activists, Greenpeace adds, aren’t obliged to “hew to strict literalisms or scientific precision.”

So, even if Resolute hasn’t literally “destroyed” the forest or pushed caribou into a “death spiral,” Greenpeace feels entitled to say that it did—and the U.S. judiciary may agree. “We’re doing legitimate advocacy work,” says Wetterer. 

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 11 other media organizations have filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Greenpeace. They point to a 1988 Supreme Court decision that protected s right to publish a parody ad depicting the late conservative Christian evangelist Jerry Falwell as an incestuous drunk. “In the world of debate about public affairs,” the court’s unanimous ruling read, “many things done with motives that are less than admirable are protected by the First Amendment.”

A federal judge is expected to hear Greenpeace’s motion to dismiss the Resolute suit this fall. Unsettling though it may be to watch a litigant wrap its free-speech fate in a revolting porn magazine, I predict Greenpeace will have the better of the constitutional argument. The First Amendment offers activists a strong shield.

As a final observation, though, it’s worth noting that in a different context, Greenpeace has taken a narrower view of protected expression. On ExxonSecrets.org, a website it sponsors, the organization says that the oil company ’s past support for climate-change denial doesn’t deserve First Amendment insulation. There is a “responsibility that goes with freedom of speech, which is based around honesty and transparency,” Greenpeace asserts. “Freedom of speech does not apply to misinformation and propaganda.” Those lines sound an awful lot like something Resolute would say.

Paul Barrett

@AuthorPMBarrett

More From this publisher : HERE

=>
***********************************************
Article Source Here: How a Canadian Timber Company Is Using U.S. Racketeering Law to Go After Greenpeace
************************************
=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  BuletViralTraffic 

=>>

How a Canadian Timber Company Is Using U.S. Racketeering Law to Go After Greenpeace was originally posted by Viral News 1

This GENIUS Invention Is Saving the Lives of Thousands of Animals

Sponsored by  SmartQuotes - Your daily smart quote 

=>

ummer remains in full speed, which suggests swimming pools are open for service. And if you have a one in your yard, you understand complete well that they're a great deal of work to keep, particularly if living animals discover a house in them.

Unfortunately, this can in some cases end up being a death trap for them, however thankfully there's now a method to avoid that.

Enter the FrogLog

Biologist Rich Mason developed the creation in 2004, when his pals found dead frogs in their brand-new in-ground swimming pool.

As an outcome, Mason built the FrogLog, which is basically a life-raft to assist small animals from the water and onto dry land. Given that animals intuitively go to the edge of swimming pools trying to find an escape, it has actually assisted not simply frogs, however mice, snakes, as well as birds from damage's method.

Problem fixed and lives conserved, all for the low rate of around $48 on Amazon

The evaluations are respectable up until now with lots of FrogLog fans reporting an animal death-free summertime swimming pool experience, and who does not desire an animal death-free summertime swimming pool experience?

Exactly.

For more info, make certain to have a look at the FrogLog site .

More From this publisher: HERE

=>
***********************************************
Learn More Here: This GENIUS Invention Is Saving the Lives of Thousands of Animals
************************************
=>

This article was searched, compiled, delivered and presented using  BuletViralTraffic 

=>>

This GENIUS Invention Is Saving the Lives of Thousands of Animals was originally posted by Viral News 1